interjection “Here�s my own retroactive study. The first routinely recommended vaccine was in 1917. The average life expectancy then was 48.4 years. The vaccine schedule hasn�t changed much since the 1970s until today. Life expectancy in 1970 was 67. Now that we�ve had a few decades of relatively the same vaccine schedule, life expectancy is up to 79 years.
I fear you will argue that it has nothing to do with vaccines because the only reason we are healthier is because of hygiene. Proper hygiene definitely plays a part but if vaccines were dangerous, considering that at least 90% of people follow the recommended schedule and the average life expectancy is increasing, it seems that vaccines are not a huge killer. ”
Seriously???
So let me rephrase it.
You agree to me that a placebo study is needed in order to determine risk.
BUT based on this whole calculation you say that since life expectency went up (based on average life ) then vaccines can’t be too bad . because even if hygenie helped (+ all medication for heart attack and cancer and phenomena,etc. ) the life expectency still went up … and you feel that its right to FORCE me as a parent to take this risk based on this calculation ????
are you really saying this???
can we please keep to logic and not just arguments for the sake of arguments.
I think that driving at 85 mph can’t be too bad , because life expectency went up . so it can’t be too dangerous. so now you can force me to drive at 85 mph or ..