Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Please explain Ivermectin Reply To: Please explain Ivermectin

#2007233
Deprecated: Function seems_utf8 is deprecated since version 6.9.0! Use wp_is_valid_utf8() instead. in /var/www/html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131 TorahUmadda-731-MelechYavanHarasha
Participant

Health:
“TU -�The only illiterate individual here is you, who wishes to ignorantly blather on about �there is no cure etc� and other such nonsense.�

The fact that you are posting to me � shows your Extreme Haughtiness!”
Touch�. I apologize, I didn’t meant to be that strident. And I definitely am not an anav k’Moshe.

“It�s not a cure, but a therapy.
It�s obvious that you�re a Paper Pusher, Not a Clinician.”
I’m not a clinician or a paper pusher. I’m a researcher. (‘Paper pusher’ implies useless administrative bureaucracy.) I have helped a great many people acquire treatment for covid, or for post-vaccine side effects, or to prophylax against either of those. I have also helped a number of organizations develop or source anti-govt position covid policies. I am currently assisting with a lawsuit regarding vaccine mandates for people who already had covid. I have written a few essays regarding Ivermectin, one of which was enthusiastically endorsed by Pierre Kory personally. Ivermectin used by a competent doctor has >95% efficacy in early treatment to fully cure the patient of covid & any post-covid lingering pathologies, something not adequately captured by studies.

“I�m the only one on this site that says Ivermectin is okay to use for Covid 19.
NOT AAQ, not 2scents and especially Not the Government!
From my post on page 1:
�Ivermectin from a Meta-analysis �
69% improvement� ”
Touche again, I did not know that you are the lone voice of anything approaching reason here, I only commented in the first place because someone requested I post something responding to the conversation, I have no idea who is saying what generally, and I noticed your comments against some of what I said in my first post; and comments from those who are against Ivermectin are simply illiteracy and lack of comprehension about what exactly is being captured from the real world in these various studies, about which there is little I can say beyond the first post I made addressing the mechanisms of action for Ivermectin re covid. Either you understand the nature, and flaws, of studies, or you don’t. Simple cursory analysis of real-world experience with Ivermectin reveals that it is brilliantly effective, anyone who fails to see that is either intellectually dishonest, or has not looked at the actual unadulterated data/court cases/doctor testimonials (also an intellectually dishonest thing to do).