Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Presidential power › Reply To: Presidential power

#2380142

> The filibuster is anti-democratic. In a democracy a majority of the legislature should be able to pass laws without a minority having veto.

You see how greek culture crept into the yiddishe shtetl of Monsey! It took just 2000 something years.

Who said we are looking for democracy?! Surely, american founding fathers did not. History assimilated lessons of Greek direct democracy and even more stable Roman Republic and decided that democracy is unworkable – for centuries. Indeed, how could you expect uncultured masses to participate in deciding complex matters of the state. Better left to the experts, appointed by the King. The idea was looked upon again in 18th-19th century and it started working after a number of trials-and-errors that cost millions of lives. US as a far-away huge province had luxury to think a little bit and then practice a little, and worked out a system that slows down democracy to make it manageable. By now, some of these safeguards are weakened (senators are not elected by legislators, states lost lots of powers, politicians have more information about voters than voters about politicians…), so stop picking on remaining ones, like filibuster, independent courts.