Come on Menachem
Lets rehash it –
mag says clearly that there is no nevu�a untill elyahu hanavi.
He talks about nevu�a as chazal call it such.
That hazal type of nevu�a does not exist anymore .
That hazal type of nevu�a [again] has clear and dramatic halachik ramifications.
For example �
1] a navi needs to tested .
if he fails the test , even by a hairsbreath , he is halachically considered a navi sheker .
And hayav be mitat beit din .
2] if he is a navi emet , any jew not listening to him is hayav mitah biyedei shamayim,
not something to be trifled with.
��
Now lets face it � what type of navi did the late leader of habad claim to be , in his sicha of shoftim [5751] ?
The hazal type of navi ?
or the imitation of the hazal type of navi ?
.
.
.