anon1m0us says:
@Hakatan,
A) Not ONE gadol holds that the 3 oaths are in effect. NOT one!!! Anyone with Daas understands this.
1) the 3 oaths is a nice Medrish. It is not mentioned anywhere in Navi.
2) it was ONLY during the first churban. There were NO Oaths at the second.
It is mentioned in Meseches Kesubos as the Halachic opinion of Rav Yehuda. Most Gedolim understood it simple and plain, although there is the Hetter of the Avnei Nezer that conditions one on the rest.
And since it was an opinion of Rav Yehuda, an Amora, it was obviously not only about the first Galus. Since when is an explicit mention in Torah Shebiksav the golden standard in Judaism?
It is highly questionable whether any of the two oaths were violated, and if it matters at this point, and how to react even if it does. But changing the Torah to match a desired result is not an option.